Monday, April 23, 2012

Anders Behring Breivik describes Utøya massacre to Oslo court | World news | guardian.co.uk

Anders Behring Breivik describes Utøya massacre to Oslo court | World news | guardian.co.uk

Anders Behring Breivik describes Utøya massacre to Oslo court

Norwegian gives emotionless account of attack and dismisses psychiatrists' assessments of him as insane
Warning: readers may find content upsetting
Anders Behring Breivik during his trial
Anders Behring Breivik gave a detailed, dispassionate account of his actions during the massacre on Utøya. Photograph: Alexander Widding/Demotix/Corbis
What he was about to describe, he cautioned, would be "horrendous".
But no warning could truly prepare Oslo criminal court for the experience of listening to Anders Behring Breivik detail in a calm, blank way how he gunned down terrified teenagers in the second of two attacks he carried out on 22 July last year.
The 33-year-old spent two hours on Friday afternoon giving a bullet-by-bullet account of what he refers to as his "operation" on the island of Utøya., where the youth wing of Norway's Labour party was holding its annual summer camp. He shot and killed 67 people on the island that day; another fell off a cliff and died trying to escape. One more, a 17-year-old called Håkon Ødegaard, drowned while attempting to swim away.
Leaning back in his chair, twizzling a pen in his right hand, Breivik – flushed, but never losing control — told of how some of the children he killed were so paralysed with fear that he had time to reload his rifle before shooting them. He'd never seen such a thing, he said – not even on TV.
He recalled teenagers "playing dead" whom he slowly approached before shooting them at close range.
Relatives of those he had killed hugged each other. Some who had dodged his bullets stared straight ahead. There were tears in the eyes of some of the most experienced journalists in the courtroom. Lawyers bit their lips as they listened to Breivik, in a clear, measured voice, remember how he decided halfway through the massacre to "look for places where I would naturally try to hide."
On the west side of the island, he said he came across a group "hiding, pressing themselves against the cliff face." With nowhere to run, he was able to shoot them too. Another gang had clustered near an escarpment beneath Kjærlighetsstien, Lovers' Path. Spotting them, he murdered five, claiming his youngest victim, Sharidyn Meegan Ngahiwi Svebakk-Bøhn, who had just celebrated her 14th birthday.
Breivik remembered campers "screaming and begging for their lives."
One boy saw him coming and shouted "Please, mate". Breivik shot him regardless: "I shot everyone there." He repeatedly recalled taking what he called "follow-up" shots to ensure that those on the ground were really dead. It was just one of a string of military terminology he used on Friday to describe the massacre. He also referred to using a building on the island as a "forward operational base". It was to there that, in one of the most tragic twists, he had persuaded his first victim to help him carry a bag containing extra rounds of ammunition.
Trond Berntsen, 51, one of the island's security officials, had met Breivik off the ferry. Utøya's head of security, Monica Elisabeth Bøsei, had been told by Breivik that he needed to her help to sail to the island because he was a police officer who had come to reassure campers in the wake of the Oslo bombing he had carried out barely an hour earlier. He was dressed in police uniform, and Bøsei believed him. As Breivik put it: "She bought it." Within five minutes of Breivik setting foot on the island, both the security officals were lying dead between the pier and the so-called information building.
Breivik has never expressed remorse for the attacks, saying those he killed on Utøya were not "innocent, non-political children" but "young people who worked to actively uphold multicultural values", and, as such, "legitimate targets". His plan was to kill all 564 people on the island, he had said on Thursday, though he thought most would drown trying to flee his bullets: "The main goal was to use the water as a mass destruction method," he said. "It's hard to swim if you have death anxiety."
But he said on Friday that he had deliberately spared those who looked the youngest, recalling at one point how he encountered "a small boy ... crying hard". Breivik said: "I don't know if he is paralysed, he is just standing there, crying. And he looks very small, very vulnerable, I thought he can't possibly be 16 years old, so I said 'fine, just relax, things will work out.'" He turned around and carried on his killing spree.
Hearing a helicopter overhead, Breivik said he considered killing himself. "I thought, 'do I really want to survive this? I will be the most hated person in Norway and every day for the rest of my life will be a nightmare.' And then I looked over and saw my Glock [pistol], and I thought, 'all right should I shoot myself in the head?'"
But what stopped him pulling the trigger was the thought of the 1,801-page manifesto he had spent five years compiling in an attempt to make Norway wake up to what he sees as the "systematic deconstruction of the Norwegian and European culture" from multiculturalism. "I thought about the compendium, thought, 'you are obliged to fight and if you are unable to fulfil a mission you should let yourself be arrested and fight for your cause through the judicial procedure or prison.'"
Breivik was eventually arrested by Delta, the Norwegian special forces, after leaving 69 people dead and injuring a further 33 on the island. He immediately confessed to the murders, as well as to planting the bomb in Oslo's government district which had killed eight earlier in the day.
As such, the only real question for the court to decide is whether Breivik is "criminally insane". The self-styled "militant nationalist" insists he knew exactly what he was doing when he planned and carried out the attacks. On Friday he again attacked the two psychiatrists who produced the first evaluation of his mental health last year, coming to the conclusion that he was not of sound mind and should be locked up in a secure hospital rather than a prison. A second report came to the opposite conclusion.
"This case is very simple," said Breivik. "I'm not a psychiatric case and I am sane ... it's very important to see the difference between political extremism and lunacy in a clinical sense."
Questioned by his own lawyers how he was able to carry out the attacks, he described a "meditation" technique he had developed which mixed "Christian prayer" and Japanese "Bushido warrior codex" practised by Samurai fighters.
He insisted he was a "nice person" who was capable of empathising with those whose lives he had ruined, but that he had chosen not to as a self-preservation technique. "In many ways it is a protection mechanism," he said. "First of all, if you are going to be capable of executing such a bloody and horrendous operation you need to work on your mind, your psyche for years. We have seen from military traditions you cannot send an unprepared person into war."
Asked how he was able to talk about the atrocities in such an impassive manner, Breivik said he had learnt to rely on "technical, de-emotionalised language" — "if I was going to use normalised language it would not have been possible" to go through police interviews and "this trial", he added. "People say, 'he must be a monster, he cannot be from this planet, he must have no emotions and empathy left', but this has to do with preparing and training."
Questioned as to his client's sanity after the end of the court session, Geir Lippestad, Breivik's defence lawyer, said: "It's not just a coincidence that very skilled experts have arrived at different conclusions."

Anders Behring Breivik Says He Shared in Loss - NYTimes.com

Anders Behring Breivik Says He Shared in Loss - NYTimes.com

Norwegian Who Killed 77 Says He Shared in Loss

OSLO — Anders Behring Breivik, the self-described anti-Islamic militant who admitted killing 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage last summer, sought Monday to include himself among the victims, telling a court that he was able to undertake the “gruesome” murders of scores of youths because they were “necessary” and telling bereaved families that he too had paid a high price.
Pool photo by Lise Aserud
Police officers flanked Anders Behring Breivik in court before his sixth day of trial began on Monday.

From the Archive
Describing how he stalked and executed teenagers attending a political youth camp on the wooded island of Utoya, Mr. Breivik, 33, said: “I have never experienced anything so gruesome. It was probably even more horrendous for those I was hunting. But it was necessary. Yes, it was necessary. The July 22 operation was necessary.”
“When people say they have lost their most beloved, I also lost my entire family, I lost my friends,” he also said. “It was my choice. I sacrificed them, but I lost my entire family and friends on 22 July. I lost everything. So to a certain extent, I understand.”
Monday was the last scheduled day of testimony from Mr. Breivik, who maintains that he acted out of a dedication to fight political acceptance of the “Islamic colonization of Norway.” The court will now begin to hear from witnesses of the shootings on Utoya, which left a total of 69 people dead, and a bomb blast in central Oslo that killed eight more people.
With his guilt already established, the trial centers on the question of whether Mr. Breivik was insane at the time of the killings. Two psychiatric reviews have come down on opposite sides of the question. He insists that he was sane, and that efforts to portray him otherwise are part of a campaign to discredit his fight against Muslim immigration.
If he is found to have been sane, the presiding judges can sentence him to up to 21 years in prison, with a provision to keep him behind bars longer if he is still considered dangerous. If he is found to have been insane, Mr. Breivik can be kept in forced psychiatric care.
Two contradictory psychiatric reports have already been handed to the court, but the final decision will be in the hands of the two professional and three lay judges at the trial.
“This case is very simply that I am not a psychotic case and I am sane,” Mr. Breivik told the court on Friday. “I understand that when you see something too extreme, you might think it is irrational and insane. But you must separate political extremism from insanity.”

In Breivik's war zone Luton, fear - and scorn | Reuters

In Breivik's war zone Luton, fear - and scorn | Reuters

In Breivik's "war zone" Luton, fear - and scorn

Related Topics


Norwegian anti-Muslim fanatic Anders Behring Breivik stands with his defence lawyer Geir Lippestad (R) during the morning break on the sixth day of his trial in Oslo April 23, 2012. REUTERS/Heiko Junge/NTB Scanpix
LUTON, England | Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:37pm BST
LUTON, England (Reuters) - Shouting taunts and trading expletives, a Muslim teenager and the leader of Britain's most prominent anti-Islam nationalist group are seconds from a fight."Why are you talking to this racist?" the youth asks a reporter walking with English Defence League leader Stephen Lennon in Luton, the British town cited as "war zone" with Islam by Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik at his trial.

Trial sharpens focus on Breivik's mental state - KansasCity.com

Trial sharpens focus on Breivik's mental state - KansasCity.com

Posted on Mon, Apr. 23, 2012 01:15 PM
PrintPrint

Email Story

close
tool goes here

Trial sharpens focus on Breivik's mental state

Updated: 2012-04-23T18:16:23Z

Terror- and murder charged Anders Behring Breivik (left), and his defence lawyer Geir Lippestad pictured during the morning break on day 6 of the trial in Oslo Monday April 23, 2012.
Lise Aserud ,POOL
Terror- and murder charged Anders Behring Breivik (left), and his defence lawyer Geir Lippestad pictured during the morning break on day 6 of the trial in Oslo Monday April 23, 2012.

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik in court prior to the opening of day 6 of the trial in Oslo, Monday April 23, 2012. Breivik has admitted setting off a car bomb outside the government headquarters, killing eight, before unleashing a shooting massacre at the governing Labor Party's youth camp on Utoya.

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik in court on day 6 of the trial in Oslo, Monday April 23, 2012. Breivik has admitted setting off a car bomb outside the government headquarters, killing eight, before unleashing a shooting massacre at the governing Labor Party's youth camp on Utoya.

Terror- and murder charged Anders Behring Breivik (left), and his defence lawyer Geir Lippestad pictured during the morning break on day 6 of the trial in Oslo Monday April 23, 2012.

Terror- and murder charged Anders Behring Breivik (left), and his defence lawyer Geir Lippestad pictured during the morning break on day 6 of the trial in Oslo Monday April 23, 2012.

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik talks with defence lawyer Geir Lippestad, left, in court prior to the opening of day 6 of the trial in Oslo, Monday April 23, 2012. Breivik has admitted setting off a car bomb outside the government headquarters, killing eight, before unleashing a shooting massacre at the governing Labor Party's youth camp on Utoya.

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik talks with defence lawyer Geir Lippestad, left, in court prior to the opening of day 6 of the trial in Oslo, Monday April 23, 2012. Breivik has admitted setting off a car bomb outside the government headquarters, killing eight, before unleashing a shooting massacre at the governing Labor Party's youth camp on Utoya.
Confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik vehemently defended his sanity Monday after a forensic panel found flaws in a psychiatric report that declared him sane in the eyes of the law.
As the trial for Breivik's bomb-and-shooting rampage that killed 77 people entered its second week, the far-right fanatic told a court that he was the victim of a "racist" plot to discredit his ideology. He said no one would have questioned his sanity if he were a "bearded jihadist."
"I know I'm at risk of ending up at an insane asylum, and I'm going to do what I can to avoid that," Breivik said.
Two psychiatric examinations conducted before the trial reached opposite conclusions on whether Breivik is psychotic - the key issue to be resolved during the trial, since the 33-year-old Norwegian had admitted to the deadly attacks.
But the second of those reports, which found him sane, has not yet been approved by the Norwegian Board of Forensic Medicine. On Monday, the panel highlighted several shortcomings in that assessment, and requested additional information from the two psychiatrists who wrote it.
In particular, the forensic board said it could not be established whether Breivik had adjusted his behavior during the examination as part of a strategy to be declared mentally competent.
Paal Groendahl, a forensic psychologist who is not involved with the case but has followed the trial in court, said the panel's queries underscore the difficulty in assessing Breivik's state of mind.
"I don't think it's any closer to being resolved," he said.
If found sane Breivik would face 21 years in prison, though he can be held longer if deemed a danger to society. If sentenced to psychiatric care, in theory he would be released once he's no longer deemed psychotic and dangerous.
Breivik has admitted to setting off a bomb July 22 that killed eight people outside government headquarters in Oslo and then going on a shooting spree at the Labor Party's youth camp, killing 69 people. More than half of the victims were teenagers.
He rejects criminal guilt for the rampage, saying the victims had betrayed their country by embracing immigration.
"I see all multicultural political activists as monsters, as evil monsters who wish to eradicate our people, our ethnic group, our culture and our country," he told the court Monday.
The self-styled crusader apologized to the family of a pub owner who was among the victims in the bomb blast, saying it was not his intention to kill "civilians."
But he refused to apologize to the families of those killed on Utoya island, where members of the Labor Party's youth wing had gathered for their annual summer retreat.
"Utoya is a political indoctrination camp," he said.
Jon Hestnes, who heads a support group for victims' families and survivors, told The Associated Press it was "gruesome" to listen to Breivik's apology but it clearly showed that the man was insane.
"It's an insult to the 76 other people who actually died because of that man," Hestnes said. "He's not in our world. He isn't, and he doesn't have humanity at all. The way I slap little mosquitoes in the summer, that's how he is about human lives."
Speaking calmly, Breivik said he used a handgun to kill victims if the distance was less than 10 meters (30 feet). Otherwise he used his rifle.
Asked why he spared one man who survived the shooting spree, Breivik said he thought it was because the man's appearance made him look "right wing-oriented."
"When I looked at him I saw myself," Breivik said. "I think that was the reason that I didn't fire shots at him."
Breivik became defensive as prosecutors quizzed him about the 1,500-page manifesto he posted online before the attacks. It describes uniforms, medals, greetings and codes of conduct for the "Knights Templar" militant group that he claims to belong to. Many groups claim the name, but prosecutors don't believe it exists as Breivik has described.
In the document, Breivik speculated that the loyalty of potential knights might be tested by asking them to undergo surgical amputation and castration. Breivik chastised prosecutor Svein Holden, saying the segment was taken out of context.
Holden also highlighted a section in which Breivik described different categories of "martyrdom" operations for Christian militants, and which of them would grant access to heaven.
"It's not particularly helpful that you're facilitating my appearing insane by taking things out of context like this," Breivik said. "But it's not irrational, this is a theological debate, and it's part of our history."
Breivik said had he been an Islamist terrorist, no one would have questioned his mental state.
"But because I am a militant nationalist, I am being subjected to grave racism," he said. "They are trying to delegitimize everything I stand for."
Breivik said he understood the pain he caused the families of those killed on Utoya, comparing their loss to how he lost contact with his own family and friends following the attacks.
"The only difference was that for my part it was a choice," he said.
The trial is scheduled to go on nine more weeks.
Posted on Mon, Apr. 23, 2012 01:15 PM

Legalizing Marijuana: Impacts on Prison Systems and the Economy - DailyFinance

Legalizing Marijuana: Impacts on Prison Systems and the Economy - DailyFinance

Legalizing Marijuana: Impacts on Prison Systems and the Economy


Posted 1:16PM 04/23/12 Posted under: Investing
Over the past few years, there has been a lot of talk about the legalization of marijuana and how it would affect our economy. Some numbers point to the reduction of government costs of prison sentences, while others point to taxation and additional revenue streams. Some people think that the federal government is wasting resources by keeping the drug at a Schedule I level, and prosecuting those caught with it. Other people think that legalizing it would be a boon to the economy.
According to Forbes, the IRS has been at the forefront of the crackdown on medicinal marijuana dispensaries, but not because they've been baking their books -- they've actually been paying their taxes. It's because of a federal targeting effort to shut down the industry.
Even state and local governments disagree with the attack, though. The legalization of marijuana can open up the possibility to regulate it. That regulation implies the opportunity to tax the drug, and it also makes law enforcement easier. The localization of the growing process can help to weed out drug dealers, gangs, and cartels as well.

Psychology, Public Policy and Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Psychology, Public Policy and Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Psychology, Public Policy and Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Psychology, Public Policy and Law
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
DisciplinePsychology
LanguageEnglish
Edited byRonald Roesch
Publication details
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (USA)
Frequencyquarterly
Impact factor
(2009)
2.269
Indexing
ISSN1076-8971
Links
Psychology, Public Policy and Law is a quarterly multi-disciplinary scientific journal published by the American Psychological Association (APA). It publishes original empirical papers, reviews and meta-analyses on the contribution of psychological science to law and public policy. [1]
The journal has a 2010 ISI impact factor of 2.16, and is ranked in three categories: Law (17th of 128), Multi-disciplinary Psychology (17th of 120), and health policy (16th of 56).[2]
Current editor (2008-2012):
Past Editors:

[edit] References

  1. ^ Psychology Public Policy and Law American Psychological Association Website
  2. ^ 2010 Journal Citation Reports - Social Science; Thomson-Reuters / ISI

[edit] External links

International Academy of Law and Mental Health

International Academy of Law and Mental Health

XXXIIIrd Congress of the International Academy of Law and Mental Health
Amsterdam, Netherlands
July 14th-19th, 2013


The American College of Forensic Psychology



28th Annual Symposium

April 19-22, 2012

San Francisco • Stanford Court Hotel

The American College of Forensic Psychology is approved by the

American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education

for psychologists. ACFP maintains responsibility for this program and

its content. This program will offer a maximum of 23 hours of Continuing

Education credits.


Wednesday, April 18

4:00-5:30 Early Registration

Thursday, April 19

7:00-7:45 Registration and Continental Breakfast

7:45-8:00 Opening Remarks and Announcements

International Academy of Law and Mental Health

International Academy of Law and Mental Health
33rd International Congress of Law and Mental Health
The next congress will be in Amsterdam in 2013


About the Academy
The IALMH is founded on the belief that issues arising from the interaction of law and mental health can best be addressed through multidisciplinary and cross-national approaches, drawing on law, the health professions, the social sciences, and the humanities.
Every other year, the IALMH holds an International Congress on Law and Mental Health, bringing together the international community of researchers, academics, practitioners and professionals in the field whose wide-ranging perspectives provide for a comprehensive look at important law and mental health issues.
Academy Regulations (FRA)
Academy Regulations (ENG)


Law and Human Behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Law and Human Behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Law and Human Behavior
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Law and Human Behavior
Law and Human Behavior
DisciplineLegal psychology, forensic psychology
LanguageEnglish
Edited byMargaret Bull Kovera
Publication details
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association
Publication history1977-present
FrequencyBimonthly
Impact factor
(2010)
2.268
Indexing
ISSN0147-7307 (print)
1573-661X (web)
LCCN77641812
CODENLHBEDM
OCLC number03173559
Links
Law and Human Behavior is a bimonthly academic journal published by the American Psychology–Law Society. It publishes original empirical papers, reviews, and meta-analyses on how the law, legal system, and legal process relate to human behavior, particularly legal psychology and forensic psychology.[1] The current editor-in-chief is Margaret Bull Kovera (John Jay College of Criminal Justice). Past editors have been Brian Cutler (University of Ontario Institute of Technology), Richard Weiner (University of Nebraska), Ronald Roesch (Simon Fraser University), Michael J. Saks (Arizona State University), and Bruce Sales (University of Arizona).

[edit] Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed and the Social Science Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2010 impact factor of 2.268, ranking it 7th out of 58 journals in the category "Psychology, Social"[2] and 13th out of 133 journals in the category "Law".[3]

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Law and Human Behavior". American Psychological Association. January 3 2012. http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/lhb/index.aspx. Retrieved 2012-01-03.
  2. ^ "Journals Ranked by Impact: Psychology, Social". 2010 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Social Sciences ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2012.
  3. ^ "Journals Ranked by Impact: Law". 2010 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Social Sciences ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2012.

[edit] External links

Key Journals: Behavioral Forensics - Subject Guide - Forensic Science - Guides at University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Key Journals: Behavioral Forensics - Subject Guide - Forensic Science - Guides at University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Journal titles are listed in alphabetical order, not by impact factor.
  • American Journal of Forensic Psychology
    Print only. Available at Law Library (Periodicals): v.1 (1983) to the present.
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
    Print only. Vol.1 (1978) to present available at the Law Library (Periodicals; K9 .N847).
  • Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
    Print only. Available at the Law Library (Periodicals; K10 .O896244).
  • The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
    Link to full-text from 1998 (12-month delay in availability of current issue due to publisher's restrictions).
  • Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
    Link to full-text from 1996 to the present.
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
    Link to full-text from 2001 (6-month delay in availability of current issue due to publisher's restrictions).
  • Psychology, Crime & Law
    Link to full-text from vol. 6 (Dec. 2000) to the present.

Psychiatry Books

Psychiatry Books


Search Results

  1. Clinical Trials in Psychiatry
  2. books
    .google.comBrian S. Everitt, Brian Everitt, Simon Wessely - 2008 - 248 pages - Preview
    At last – a new edition of the highly acclaimed book Clinical Trials in Psychiatry This book provides a concise but thorough overview of clinical trials in psychiatry, invaluable to those seeking solutions to numerous problems relating to ...

  3. Psychiatry and Heart Disease: The Mind, Brain, and Heart
  4. books
    .google.comMichelle Riba, Lawson Wulsin, Melvyn Rubenfire - 2012 - 272 pages - Preview
    This unique book will help psychiatrists to understand better the risks of cardiovascular illness and cardiologists to appreciate possible pathophysiological links with psychiatric conditions.

  5. Handbook of cultural psychiatry
  6. books
    .google.comWen-Shing Tseng - 2001 - 855 pages - Preview
    This is the first book of its kind to be written in textbook style for national and international readers and particularly for clinicians working in multiethnic societies.

  7. Textbook of Hospital Psychiatry
  8. books
    This is the only textbook on the market today that provides information for psychiatric hospital clinicians and administrators in a single all-inclusive volume.

  9. Psychiatry essentials for primary care
  10. books
    Psychiatry Essentials for Primary Care now becomes the cornerstone work that helps physicians help those with mental disorders. Book jacket.

  11. Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry
  12. books
    .google.comMohammed T. Abou-Saleh, Mohammed M. Abou-Saleh, Cornelius L. E. Katona - 2011 - 934 pages - Preview
    Featuring contributions by distinguished authors from around the world, the book offers a distinctive angle o; issues in this continually developing discipline. Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry provides a comprehensive ...

  13. Introductory textbook of psychiatry
  14. books
    .google.comDonald W. Black, Nancy C. Andreasen - 2010 - 717 pages - Preview
    Now in its fifth edition, this best-selling book has been revised and updated to reflect the latest advancements in the field.

  15. Listening to Prozac
  16. books
    .google.comPeter D. Kramer - 1994 - 409 pages - Snippet view
     

  17. New Scientist - 14 Mar 1963 - Page 589
  18. books
    .google.comVol. 17, No. 330 - 52 pages - Magazine - Full view
    How have they contrived this implication in a book whose chosen period closes over a hundred years ago? Here let the authors speak for themselves: This book owes its inception to the fact that as practising psychiatrists we were ...

  19. Child Psychology and Psychiatry: Frameworks for Practice

books
.google.comDavid Skuse, Helen Bruce, Linda Dowdney - 2011 - 318 pages - Preview
David Mrazek, Professor of Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Written by leading clinicians and research experts in the fields of child development and psychopathology, this book is an authoritative and up to date guide ...



Ads

  1. Free Psychology Diploma
  2. www.alison.com/
    Study and learn from Home or Work
    Self-Paced Online Certified Course

  3. Compra con descuentos
  4. www.groupon.com.pr/
    No dejes pasar estas oportunidades.
    Hasta 70% Dscto para Disfrutar!

  5. Psychiatrists books
  6. www.pazienti.net/answers
    Search Psychiatrists books!
    Free answers from real doctors

  7. Compare Textook Prices.
www.booksprice.com/
Search and compare textbook prices.
Find cheaper books.

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

What makes belief a delusion?

What makes belief a delusion?