4:28 PM 6/29/2012 - Mike Nova's starred items
The Lancet, Volume 379, Issue 9835, Page 2413, 30 June 2012
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61048-4Cite or Link Using DOI
The battle about Breivik's mind
Is mass murderer Anders Breivik sane or insane? Forensic psychiatry has been under scrutiny during his court case, which heard closing arguments last week. Per Helge Måseide reports from Oslo.
On July 22, 2011, Anders Breivik killed eight people by detonating a bomb in the Norwegian Government's building complex. Thereafter he moved on to the idyllic Utøya Island and shot and killed 67 people, one by one, at the annual summer camp for the Labour party's youth organisation. Another two died when they tried to escape.
Shortly after the crime, Breivik's defence attorney, Geir Lippestad, told the press that he thought his client was insane. However, he has spent the past 10 weeks trying to convince the court of the opposite. “For a political activist, the worst thing thinkable is being sent to a psych ward”, Breivik told the court.
Breivik put together a large publication—2083—a European Declaration of Independence—in which a network called the Knights Templar plays an essential part. In the document, the defendant describes his alleged leadership role as a “perfect knight” in a civil war-like fight against multiculturalism and Islamisation. No one has been able to track down this network's existence. “He thinks it is his mission to decide who should live and die”, said Synne Sørheim who, together with Torgeir Husby, undertook the initial forensic psychiatric assessment, diagnosing Breivik as having paranoid schizophrenia with persistent delusions.
The Norwegian court system employs the biological principle, which means that the presence of psychosis at the time a crime is committed will automatically result in a ruling of insanity, independent of the intent of the perpetrator. Any justified doubt in this regard should favour insanity.
Persistent delusions that are culturally inappropriate or implausible are one of the possible symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. A person with this diagnosis is considered to have psychosis under Norwegian law. Cognitive abilities may remain intact, which might explain the fact that Breivik was able to successfully plan and complete his horrific attacks.
Both the methods and conclusions of the initial psychiatric report have been widely debated, including by several psychiatrists, after being leaked to the press. Critics said that Breivik's strange word usage, viewed in the first report as neologisms (made-up words or phrases that only have meaning to the speaker and often occur in the speech of people with schizophrenia), were not placed into a relevant right-wing political context. In January, the court decided that Breivik should be involuntarily observed in prison.
Health personnel affiliated with the prison testified in court and reported that they had not seen any signs of psychosis. Neither did the new forensic psychiatrists, Agnar Aspaas and Terje Tørrissen, who concluded that Breivik had dissocial and narcissistic personality disorders with paranoid traits. They believe that the excessive violence on July 22 was the result of extreme political attitudes, and not delusions. Husby and Sørheim think that right-wing extremism is not the defendant's primary issue, but a repository for his delusions. They found that Breivik displayed mental stimulation chiefly when talking about killing and violence.
Although the public was appeased with the conclusion that Breivik did not have psychosis, the Norwegian Forensic Commission, which peer reviews all forensic reports and statements, asked whether the general criteria for personality disorder were met. In court the commission also criticised Husby and Sørheim for a lack of follow-up questions when diagnosing Breivik.
It is unclear why Breivik moved back in with his mother in 2006, where he spent his days playing World of Warcraft on the internet. According to him, this was for training before the terrorist attacks. According to Husby and Sørheim this could represent the onset of schizophrenia—he quit working, began to behave strangely, and withdrew from social contact with family and friends. However, according to Aspaas and Tørrissen, his antisocial behaviour was already developed, and he may have chosen to live with his mother for practical reasons while he maintained social contact in a virtual world.
Only the first report by Husby and Sørheim was undertaken while Breivik was in isolation and the question has been raised whether he subsequently dissimilated and feigned sanity. In closing statements, because the prosecutors were in doubt, they argued in keeping with legal practice that Breivik is insane. “The most important thing is that he gets put into a cage, and is never set free. I think he knows exactly what he's done. But I'm not a forensic psychiatrist”, says a mother who lost her son in the shooting. At that moment, as people cry in a silent courtroom, Breivik is smiling. The killer cried only once during the case, while watching his own propaganda video.
The court will announce their verdict on Aug 24. Whether he will be detained as a patient or a prisoner remains to be seen.
Full-size image (22K) Per Helge Måseide
via The Lancet by Per Helge Måseide on 6/29/12
Is mass murderer Anders Breivik sane or insane? Forensic psychiatry has been under scrutiny during his court case, which heard closing arguments last week. Per Helge Måseide reports from Oslo.
via The Lancet by Richard Horton on 6/29/12
For many non-Americans, the intense struggle between Barack Obama, an elected President who signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, and an unelected Supreme Court, which has been deliberating on the constitutional legality of the Act, has been puzzling. Irrespective of the Court's decision, which is an important but still small footnote to a dispute that will likely continue to divide Americans, the more troubling question is why one of the most scientifically and culturally advanced nations of the world has been so reticent about embracing universal health coverage? Some critics have argued that Presidents Clinton and Obama, strenuous advocates for extending health coverage, focused too much on the economics of healthcare.
via Sciences Indexed Since 1998 on 6/28/12
Bipolar disorder (BP) patients with comorbid anxiety disorders (ADs) showed more severe clinical characteristics and psychosocial function impairment, worse response to treatment, and more substance use than those without AD. However, few studies focus on differences in neuropsychological functio...
via psychiatry - Google News on 6/28/12
Letter to a Young Psychiatrist
Psychiatric Times Psychiatry is a profession that deeply needs honest workers who are willing to seek a knowing ignorance, to be dissatisfied, and to refuse to conform—doing so in the interest of the truth and of the profession, seeing both as inseparable. |
via Home | psychiatry.org on 6/28/12
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by a decision of 5-4.This post has been generated by Page2RSS
via psychiatry - Google Blog Search by Dr Justin Marley on 6/28/12
Thomas Kuhn's 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions' was a landmark publication which helped reassess and refine the understanding of the core principles of scientific endeavour. The essence of Kuhn's work was that ...
via psychiatry - Google Blog Search by SYA on 6/28/12
By George Kleban For thousands of years, human beings have examined the functions of the human mind from traditional civilizations like Greece and Egypt.
via psychiatry - Google Blog Search by Andres Barkil-Oteo on 6/28/12
For psychiatry to save itself, it needs to embrace evidence as the standard that is applied to all practices (including psychopharmacology), return to the centre of the mental health field by embracing prescribing as only one tool among many, ...
via international psychiatry - Google News on 6/21/12
Breivik trial: live report
AFP The trial of Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik concluded on Friday, with his defence team arguing he was sane enough to be responsible for his actions and should be acquitted or jailed, not locked up in a psychiatric institution. The 33-year ... |
No comments:
Post a Comment